Guest_ikonboard Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 ... red fish blue fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanChief Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 How accurate is this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest_ikonboard Posted April 11, 2005 Author Share Posted April 11, 2005 How accurate is this? By county Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XUXAW Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 How accurate is this? By county Nope By street Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanChief Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 How accurate is this? By county Jeez, of all the counties I could pick to live, I settle in a friggin blue one! I'm in Hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 it's ok kc..i'm in a red county....wanna trade? eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 actually we have parishes.. hard to believe that nearly the same amount of people voted in the red/blue areas....shows something about our population densities....not sure what, but it shows something... eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottdog Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 That's alot of god dam Jesus fish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skielty1 Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skielty1 Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skielty1 Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoFeather Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 Kentucky and Tennesee average IQ in the 90's. I know that can't be right. Way too much inbreeding for that kind of IQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kstehman Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Interesting, the red states seem to have the lowest IQ's. Mabye that's a clue as to why things are so screwed up now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Whohoo....tied for 41!!!! Bring that IMC or IMO or whatever it will be factory to Louisiana! eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pop Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Poll is screwy. New Hampshire in the three digits. If we were that smart, we'ld have known enough to leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firefinder Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Whohoo....tied for 41!!!! Bring that IMC or IMO or whatever it will be factory to Louisiana!eric All that high falutin learnin don't mean squat. I'll bet all you blue staters think that pie R square...Hell us Louisiana fellers like me n homer nose pie or round... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 ah Justin...God rest his soul....he is dead rt? eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest_ikonboard Posted April 12, 2005 Author Share Posted April 12, 2005 Why let a few facts get in the way of a good argument? The Economist issued a retraction on May 20, 2004: Clueless in St James's Last week we published a list that purported to show the IQs of states voting for George Bush and Al Gore in 2000. Alas, we were the victim of a hoax: no such data exists. By way of apology, here are two very crude ratings of states' intelligence—and how they voted. To give you a sense of why people familiar with IQ testing instantly scoffed at the validity of the hoax data claiming the average IQ in Connecticut was 113 and in Utah was 87, it's important to understand how IQ tests are scored. The mean is typically set at 100 and the standard deviation at 15. This means that Utah's average person would fall 1 and 11/15th standard deviations lower than the average person in Connecticut. Using the Normdist function in Excel, you can put this on a percentile basis. This hoax data therefore implies that a Utah resident of average intelligence would be only at the 4th percentile in Connecticut. The average person in Connecticut would suddenly be in the 96th percentile if they moved to Utah. Well, that's nonsense. Click here if you don't mind facts getting in the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottdog Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Man, are we a bunch of dumb fucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest_ikonboard Posted April 12, 2005 Author Share Posted April 12, 2005 Man, are we a bunch of dumb fucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skielty1 Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Why let a few facts get in the way of a good argument? The Economist issued a retraction on May 20, 2004: Clueless in St James's Last week we published a list that purported to show the IQs of states voting for George Bush and Al Gore in 2000. Alas, we were the victim of a hoax: no such data exists. By way of apology, here are two very crude ratings of states' intelligence—and how they voted. To give you a sense of why people familiar with IQ testing instantly scoffed at the validity of the hoax data claiming the average IQ in Connecticut was 113 and in Utah was 87, it's important to understand how IQ tests are scored. The mean is typically set at 100 and the standard deviation at 15. This means that Utah's average person would fall 1 and 11/15th standard deviations lower than the average person in Connecticut. Using the Normdist function in Excel, you can put this on a percentile basis. This hoax data therefore implies that a Utah resident of average intelligence would be only at the 4th percentile in Connecticut. The average person in Connecticut would suddenly be in the 96th percentile if they moved to Utah. Well, that's nonsense. Click here if you don't mind facts getting in the way. It's not true? Goddammit! Now I'm going to have to rewrite my entire doctoral dissertation. That's the last freakin' time I am EVER going to trust a website called thesodajerks.com. Next, I suppose you are going to tell me that there is no place called The United States of Canada? Or Jesusland? Like I am going to believe that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnchief03 Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Intresting that Minnesota was #1 in Math scores for 14-15 years old...... That Goes to show you what happens when you spend 60% of your states budget on education... It's friggin rediculious the amount of money spent here, and still the fuckers aren't satisfied.. All they want to do is raise my taxes (both property and income).. They spend way to much money on bull shit programs and administrators... Fuck em... ALL :veryangry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whadayawant Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Man, are we a bunch of dumb fucks. I knew that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scooter Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 No wonder I seemed so Fucking smart when I was in Cheyenne. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlkChief Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 How accurate is this? By county Nope By street Is this what's called segregation? :Thread-Dumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.