Chiefin Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 Look Here ............................ ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maldev Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 Old news and has been debunked over and over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest_ikonboard Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 Old news and has been debunked over and over again. Yep, .... ConclusionThe idea that no 757-sized airliner crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11/01 is attractive to many skeptics because it contradicts a fundamental tenet of the official story, is supported by common-sense interpretations of photographs of the crash scene, and provides an explanation for the suspicious lack of physical evidence supporting the official account. Additionally, there is a substantial body of literature by no-757-crash theorists that appears to thoroughly examine the evidence. The complexity of some of this analysis may discourage other skeptics from evaluating the evidence for themselves. As I show in this essay, many common errors in no-757-crash theories are easily exposed. Most of the no-757-crash arguments evaporate when scrutinized with attention to empirical data about the behavior of airframes in high-speed crashes, and the geometry of the Pentagon crash scene and vantage points of post-crash photographs. The remaining arguments are easily disposed of by assuming the crash was engineered, consistent with the presumed motives of the perpetrators to discredit the skeptics. Conversely, the abundant eyewitness accounts provide strong evidence for the crash of a 757 or similar aircraft. In recent high-profile attacks on the work of 9/11 skeptics, defenders of the official story have consistently focused on the no-757-crash theory as indicative of the gullibility and incompetence of the 9/11 "conspiracy theorists." Researchers including myself have contributed to this vulnerability by endorsing this theory without either weighing all the available evidence (such as the eyewitness accounts) or considering less obvious interpretations for the paucity of physical evidence of a 757 crash. The Pentagon crash is an intriguing area of research because of its many unresolved mysteries. The promotion of theories about what hit the Pentagon in highly visible media do not advance that research but instead provide our detractors with ammunition with which to discredit us, and eclipse easily established and highly incriminating facts such as where the Pentagon was hit, the astounding failures to defend the 9/11 targets, and the obvious controlled demolition of Building 7. Click here for the rest of the story. And here... ...here also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thornbury Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 I live in Northern Virginia. It happened. My best friend works for TV news, and he saw it happen. I've been to the chapel in the Pentagon that memorializes the people who died at that spot. It'll tear your heart right out. :veryangry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest_ikonboard Posted December 14, 2004 Share Posted December 14, 2004 Now for important news , Elvis is still alive, and so is Jim Morrison! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.