Jump to content
Indian Motorcycle Community
CHIEF DOC 99

N E W S & Q U R R E N T E V E N T S

Recommended Posts

I agree with your latter statements regarding viewers. However, FOX did not live stream the hearings on Wednesday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More evidence emerges that the reason the media want to

 

hide the name of the whistleblower

 

is an honest investigation into Ukraine-Biden corruption

 

would expose the whistleblower's own personal role in criminal conduct.

 

This is why we don't allow secret accusers in America.

 

**********************************************************

 

Anti-Trump CIA whistleblower Eric Ciaramella filed his second-hand “whistleblower”

 

complaint against President Trump after speaking with Adam Schiff’s team in September.

 

Ciaramella claimed he was concerned about President Trump’s discussion

 

of Hunter Biden during his call with Ukrainian President Zelensky.

 

Now we know why Ciaramella was so concerned.

According to White House visitor logs Eric Ciaramella was hosting

 

the January 19, 2016 White House meeting where Ukrainian officials

 

were told to drop the investigation into Hunter Biden.

 

The other case raised at the
January 2016 meeting
, Telizhenko said, involved Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company under investigation in Ukraine for improper foreign transfers of money. At the time, Burisma allegedly was paying then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter as both a board member and a consultant. More than $3 million flowed from Ukraine to an American firm tied to Hunter Biden in 2014-15, bank records show.

According to
Telizhenko
, U.S. officials told the Ukrainians they would prefer that Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over. The Ukrainians did not agree. But then Joe Biden pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor in March 2016, as I previously reported. The Burisma case was transferred to NABU, then shut down.

 

 

https://outline.com/geTFRE

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

O-Elephant-600-LI.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

84028900_10217238427338810_2473640204578

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mitt the SHIT!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only a corksoaker would vote for a Mittens for anything

 

not even qualified for dog catcher anywhere.

 

Ought to be a bounty on the turd.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Republicans betrayed their oaths.........

 

Evangelicals betrayed their bibles........

 

Trump supporters betrayed all logic........

 

Right wing media betrayed the truth...........

 

AG Barr betrayed the law......,,

 

Mitch McConnell betrayed democracy..........

 

The donald betrayed our country................

 

If the lying, sorry ass wanna-be king/dictator didn't do a thing wrong, why block allowing witnesses to testify..............

 

 

 

And before anyone starts call me a liberal democrat. I gonna remind all that I'm a gun toting life long republican..............

 

Just not one that is blinded by the donald's load of bullschitt...................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you asked - articles of impeachment are constitutionally provide you the majority party in power . The House has sole responsibility to investigate, prepare and present factual evidence that would exhibit High Crimes and Misdemeanors, that includes all documents and witness testimony ( they have power to supena any witness they want).

 

Once articles of impeachment are presented it is up to the Senate to evaluate all evidence presented that may prove that their was an impeachable offense . The Senate has NO constitutional authority or obligation to add or pursue any additional witnesses or evidence

 

BTW. The charges brought by the house (non partisan) ar

e Abuse of Power and obstruction of congress. There are NO statutes that address these so called charges

 

 

Enjoy the Super Bowl and loosen that knot in your panties because you will have to wear them through 2024

 

Cheers

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you asked - articles of impeachment are constitutionally provide you the majority party in power . The House has sole responsibility to investigate, prepare and present factual evidence that would exhibit High Crimes and Misdemeanors, that includes all documents and witness testimony ( they have power to supena any witness they want).

 

Once articles of impeachment are presented it is up to the Senate to evaluate all evidence presented that may prove that their was an impeachable offense . The Senate has NO constitutional authority or obligation to add or pursue any additional witnesses or evidence

 

BTW. The charges brought by the house (non partisan) ar

e Abuse of Power and obstruction of congress. There are NO statutes that address these so called charges

 

 

Enjoy the Super Bowl and loosen that knot in your panties because you will have to wear them through 2024

 

Cheers

I don't wear panties so that is not an issue.......................

 

And come on AP, I expected more outa you than the prerequisite politician's dance around the question.

 

I know what the rules say about the simple majority vote on raised questions. That is WHAT they MAY OR MAY NOT DO.

 

I asked WHY, if the lying, porn star fukkin president didn't do a thing wrong, are the gutless other 51 GOP senators afraid to hear what witnesses might say under oath, and threat of perjury charges.

 

It's because publicly presenting the truth could force them to do their job of representing the people instead of the wishes of wannabe king the donald.

 

BTW,

The game was pretty good I thought. I liked it that Andy Reid got a ring. I think he was deserving of it.

Edited by XV62

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WINNERS WIN

 

 

LOSERS {LO000OSE} WHINE

 

 

HERE'S TO LIFELONG REPUBLICANS

 

 

 

920x920.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im with you on Andy Reid. Glad he finally won the big one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2010-Indian-Motorcycles-4.jpg

 

 

2010-Indian-Motorcycles-5.jpg

 

2010-Indian-Motorcycles-2.jpg

 

2010-Indian-Motorcycles-1.jpg

 

 

2010-Indian-Motorcycles-3.jpg

 

 

FLASHBACK

 

 

runner-up-bike.jpg?v=4e89dc21

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't wear panties so that is not an issue.......................

 

And come on AP, I expected more outa you than the prerequisite politician's dance around the question.

 

I know what the rules say about the simple majority vote on raised questions. That is WHAT they MAY OR MAY NOT DO.

 

I asked WHY, if the lying, porn star fukkin president didn't do a thing wrong, are the gutless other 51 GOP senators afraid to hear what witnesses might say under oath, and threat of perjury charges.

 

It's because publicly presenting the truth could force them to do their job of representing the people instead of the wishes of wannabe king the donald.

 

BTW,

The game was pretty good I thought. I liked it that Andy Reid got a ring. I think he was deserving of it.

 

 

That's just it Robin, Why would they want to do anything for the democrats? All they have been doing is wasting the American peoples time and money trying to find something to discredit him. I would say fuck em too. They need proof he doesn't need to supply squat. Also what is wrong with fucking porn stars?? :grin: I've seen a few that are totally doable.

 

 

 

Al

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Adams Family & The Munsters are far more normal than the current group of weirdos occupying the WH.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Adams Family & The Munsters are far more normal than the current group of weirdos occupying the WH.

 

 

I think that statement works for both parties. Never understood the total hatred for Trump while the Pelosi gang gets a pass. Trust me I thought Trump was an idiot before he even entered politics but what I see is a biased witch hunt because he isn't playing suck up to everyone. Oh well you got him for another 4 years and I believe this time his win will be by a greater margin than the last time.

 

 

My .02

 

 

Al

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

That's just it Robin, Why would they want to do anything for the democrats? All they have been doing is wasting the American peoples time and money trying to find something to discredit him. I would say fuck em too. They need proof he doesn't need to supply squat. Also what is wrong with fucking porn stars?? :grin: I've seen a few that are totally doable.

 

 

 

Al

You're completely missing the point, my friend.

 

It isn't about doing anything for the democrats.

 

It is about providing to the public the truth about the whole affair.

 

There were enough polls showing that the public wanted to hear from anyone that knew anything.

 

The chicken schitt GOP senators didn't want to put the truth out in public because then they might have had to do the right thing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A 100% complete cover up is exactly what we are witnessing in the chambers of the United States Senate. A chamber made up of members who can't stand on their own two feet. Members who are too concerned about their next election. Members who are worried they won't be able to get anything passed on the floor. Members who support a complete self-righteous oligarch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You boys can always put your full support behind Bernie

?

Edited by Airpirate
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I make a decision with regard to voting for a candidate, the most important factor (for me) is not the candidate's political party affiliation. The most important factor for me is the candidate's credibility. Does the candidate have a history of telling the truth, cheating, lying, deception, fraud, disinformation, experience, etc. I vote for the candidate - e.g. the person, the individual. Do I share the same goals/views/agendas as the candidate? Political party affiliation is actually much removed (for me). For these reasons, I did not vote for Donald Trump. I find Donald Trump to be a liar, deceptive, a cheater, a manipulator, an egotistical loud mouthed man with no agendas I support. He does not know how to work with any governmental agencies and/or public/private agencies for which I share a common platform. Basically, I've hated this person/individual since I first became aware of who he is - which would date somewhere around the time he appeared to me to be a tyrant - on The Apprentice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...