Airpirate Posted November 5, 2013 Share Posted November 5, 2013 Police force man to endure several anal probes - and find nothing. The incident began January 2, 2013 after David Eckert finished shopping at the Wal-Mart in Deming. According to a federal lawsuit, Eckert didn't make a complete stop at a stop sign coming out of the parking lot and was immediately stopped by law enforcement. Eckert's attorney, Shannon Kennedy, said in an interview with KOB that after law enforcement asked him to step out of the vehicle, he appeared to be clenching his buttocks. Law enforcement thought that was probable cause to suspect that Eckert was hiding narcotics in his anal cavity. While officers detained Eckert, they secured a search warrant from a judge that allowed for an anal cavity search. The lawsuit claims that Deming Police tried taking Eckert to an emergency room in Deming, but a doctor there refused to perform the anal cavity search citing it was "unethical." But physicians at the Gila Regional Medical Center in Silver City agreed to perform the procedure and a few hours later, Eckert was admitted. What Happened While there, Eckert was subjected to repeated and humiliating forced medical procedures. A review of Eckert's medical records, which he released to KOB, and details in the lawsuit show the following happened: 1. Eckert's abdominal area was x-rayed; no narcotics were found. 2. Doctors then performed an exam of Eckert's anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found. 3. Doctors performed a second exam of Eckert's anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found. 4. Doctors penetrated Eckert's anus to insert an enema. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found. 5. Doctors penetrated Eckert's anus to insert an enema a second time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found. 6. Doctors penetrated Eckert's anus to insert an enema a third time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found. 7. Doctors then x-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found. 8. Doctors prepared Eckert for surgery, sedated him, and then performed a colonoscopy where a scope with a camera was inserted into Eckert's anus, rectum, colon, and large intestines. No narcotics were found. Throughout this ordeal, Eckert protested and never gave doctors at the Gila Regional Medical Center consent to perform any of these medical procedures. "If the officers in Hidalgo County and the City of Deming are seeking warrants for anal cavity searches based on how they're standing and the warrant allows doctors at the Gila Hospital of Horrors to go in and do enemas and colonoscopies without consent, then anyone can be seized and that's why the public needs to know about this," Kennedy said. Search Warrant Concerns There are major concerns about the way the search warrant was carried out. Kennedy argues that the search warrant was overly broad and lacked probable cause. But beyond that, the warrant was only valid in Luna County, where Deming is located. The Gila Regional Medical Center is in Grant County. That means all of the medical procedures were performed illegally and the doctors who performed the procedures did so with no legal basis and no consent from the patient. In addition, even if the search warrant was executed in the correct New Mexico county, the warrant expired at 10 p.m. Medical records show the prepping for the colonoscopy started at 1 a.m. the following day, three hours after the warrant expired. "This is like something out of a science fiction film, anal probing by government officials and public employees," Kennedy said. No Comment KOB reached out to the attorneys representing the defendants in the lawsuit and all declined to comment on the situation. The attorneys said it's their personal policy not comment on pending litigation. 4 On Your Side Investigative Reporter Chris Ramirez cornered Deming Police Chief Brandon Gigante. "As the police chief what reassurances could you give people when they come through your town that they won't be violated or abused by your police officers?" Ramirez asked Chief Gigante. "We follow the law in every aspect and we follow policies and protocols that we have in place," Chief Gigante replied. "Do you think those officers in this particular case did that?" Ramirez asked. Gigante didn't answer, instead he referred Ramirez to his attorney. The Lawsuit David Eckert is suing The City of Deming and Deming Police Officers Bobby Orosco, Robert Chavez and Officer Hernandez. Eckert is also suing Hidalgo County Hidalgo County Deputies David Arredondo, Robert Rodriguez and Patrick Green. Eckert is also suing Deputy District Attorney Daniel Dougherty and the Gila Regional Medical Center including Robert Wilcox, M.D and Okay Odocha, M.D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabRat Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Hope he wins a shit load of money Unfortunately all that does is screw the tax payers but never punish these asshats. Something has gone very wrong with our LEOs over the past few years and their abuse of power. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beebop Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Idiots in America Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Diesel Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Hell, if clenching your butt cheeks when some heavily armed cop approaches you is grounds for that kinda search ..... watch out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycorn Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 1984 is gettin closer every day... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toycar10 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 You are no longer leagly allowed to squeeze a silent but deadly out or sqeaze your cheeks cause you might have the runs. Gotta love it I think they need to have the officer involved and the judge each recieve a colon austopy and several enimas in public. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIEF DOC 99 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 (edited) Bet the wellbuggered hospital - police state victim gets billed big time for the procedures too. shitty story...when he wins his lawsuits, he would do well to stay out of those counties & that Gila butcher shop from now on. Clenched buttocks is now a universal New Mexican citizen standard behavioral trait. Edited November 6, 2013 by CHIEF DOC 99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hasbin Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Look on the bright side of it, He got a free colonoscopy.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIEF DOC 99 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsR5FvkSPO8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsR5FvkSPO8 no need 4 a cavity search in FLA ~ just let a gator loose on the perp ~ guarenteed to empty any poopchute! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longrider Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Look on the bright side of it, He got a free colonoscopy.... Well butt was it worth it LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Mark Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 As far as the two half-wit doctors involved, their malpractice carriers had best go ahead and get out their checkbooks. There are very clearly delineated lines that you Do. Not. Cross....even if these fucktards had an "Anal search warrant" you had better be DAMN careful about performing ANY procedures on ANY patient that DOES NOT CONSENT. In most cases, if has to be a threat to life and limb, and even then, sometimes your ass is hanging out in the breeze if you are wrong. Look, I extracted an iPhone from a federal prisoner once, ...the idiot shoved it up there in an attempt to smuggle it into prison, and it resulted in a bowel obstruction, so: first, it was a life threatening situation; second, he consented to having it removed; third. he was a convicted federal prisoner. The guy in this case did NOT consent, he was NOT in any medical danger, and most important, he was not convicted of anything...they just suspected he had shoved something up his ass. Had it been me, I might... might....have shot an X ray of his abdomen and pelvis...but even if there had BEEN something up there, I'd have handed the cop a pair of gloves and told him...."You want it? Help yourself. Sorry...My malpractice insurance does not cover forcible violation of another human being." Even then, I'd be on shaky ground. I'd have exposed the patient to ionizing radiation without his consent. These two assclowns?....they'll be lucky to keep their licenses. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIEF DOC 99 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpbM_dFHKWQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpbM_dFHKWQ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satdiver Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 Its all part of the new Obama Care Health Care plan. http://www.infowars.com/serial-liar-video-of-obama-blatantly-lying-36-times/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIEF DOC 99 Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 (edited) LEOs had probable cause due to gluteus maximus clenching detection? Colonoscopy clinics soon to be required at every airport and government building next to the metal detectors. Excewant caweer choice for uninsurable-disgraced physicians. No malpractice coverage required... Edited November 7, 2013 by CHIEF DOC 99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONMYI Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 Jeez, just readin this and, knowing how easy it is to erroneously misjudge ones sphincter posture and, knowing what it can bring about because of it, is enough to cause this condition in anyone that is stoped by the locals.. Damn, I'm sphinctered up just from readin this.. Sure hope he tares their asses up in his lawsuit.. Dave 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satdiver Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 Stay out of Lordsburg NM, yet another case anal probing http://www.infowars.com/cops-now-enforcing-anal-probing-on-americans-routinely/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycorn Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 (edited) the original guy did apparently have several priors most of which were dismissed which of coarse does not dilute his protections in this case and his lawyer is suing everybody within reach earlier today there was 'no comment' available from local LE... cant wait for their side of the story Edited November 7, 2013 by mycorn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K2V2 Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 Funny stuff. But not really. Actually, very scary. This wasn't the actions of one stupid cop or doctor, it was a veritable clown conspiracy. It would be hard to make this up. I hope this guy ends up rolling in dough from a big settlement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabRat Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 The guy's lawyers were on Beck yesterday. This guy had a prior drug arrest and the cops have been harassing him since - so a rolling stop was all they needed to further harass him. Evidently the K9 unit that they used as 'probable cause' because the dog was sniffing the seat was not certified for drug enforcement work - but that didn't stop these asshats. I hope they throw the book at these people, the doctors and the judge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Resort Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 As far as the two half-wit doctors involved, their malpractice carriers had best go ahead and get out their checkbooks. There are very clearly delineated lines that you Do. Not. Cross....even if these fucktards had an "Anal search warrant" you had better be DAMN careful about performing ANY procedures on ANY patient that DOES NOT CONSENT. In most cases, if has to be a threat to life and limb, and even then, sometimes your ass is hanging out in the breeze if you are wrong. Look, I extracted an iPhone from a federal prisoner once, ...the idiot shoved it up there in an attempt to smuggle it into prison, and it resulted in a bowel obstruction, so: first, it was a life threatening situation; second, he consented to having it removed; third. he was a convicted federal prisoner. The guy in this case did NOT consent, he was NOT in any medical danger, and most important, he was not convicted of anything...they just suspected he had shoved something up his ass. Had it been me, I might... might....have shot an X ray of his abdomen and pelvis...but even if there had BEEN something up there, I'd have handed the cop a pair of gloves and told him...."You want it? Help yourself. Sorry...My malpractice insurance does not cover forcible violation of another human being." Even then, I'd be on shaky ground. I'd have exposed the patient to ionizing radiation without his consent. These two assclowns?....they'll be lucky to keep their licenses. So what's your opinion? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabRat Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 This one doesn't have a happy ending What the hell is going on with our police? http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11/06/dads-attempt-to-teach-son-a-lesson-ends-in-the-most-tragic-way-possible/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hasbin Posted November 8, 2013 Share Posted November 8, 2013 This one doesn't have a happy ending What the hell is going on with our police? http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11/06/dads-attempt-to-teach-son-a-lesson-ends-in-the-most-tragic-way-possible/ Darwin's law @ work,,, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabRat Posted November 8, 2013 Share Posted November 8, 2013 Darwin's law maybe, but there is a clear change in police behavior. From the NY cops that were part of the SUV attack to the anal probes to this to the taser episode earlier this week in St. Louis where a father was trying to get back into his house to rescue his 3 year old that later died in the house. The stories go on and on - there is something going on that just doesn't sit right. http://www.myfoxny.com/Story/23906473/police-stun-stepdad-trying-to-save-son-from-fire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Mark Posted November 8, 2013 Share Posted November 8, 2013 Darwin's law maybe, but there is a clear change in police behavior. From the NY cops that were part of the SUV attack to the anal probes to this to the taser episode earlier this week in St. Louis where a father was trying to get back into his house to rescue his 3 year old that later died in the house. The stories go on and on - there is something going on that just doesn't sit right. http://www.myfoxny.com/Story/23906473/police-stun-stepdad-trying-to-save-son-from-fire I think things have been going downhill since the damn "Patriot" Act. I think that damn thing pisses all over the Constitution. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabRat Posted November 8, 2013 Share Posted November 8, 2013 I think things have been going downhill since the damn "Patriot" Act. I think that damn thing pisses all over the Constitution. Yup and couple that with the feds arming LEOs better than most standing armies around the world and you have a serious problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.