Vintageroger Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Move along comrade, nothing to see here. We just want to see who you have been talking to. Hope you don’t have Verizon phone service because the NSA has been seeing all, as in everyone’s call records. I would think that if they did Verizon, ATT & Sprint are also involved and they just have not found out yet. This Administration has gone too far. The Government has too much control of our life’s. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycorn Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 orwell didn miss by much... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIEF DOC 99 Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Quiet down and eat your soilent green ~ it's loaded with nutrients and psyche meds for your wellbein'. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airpirate Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 The Sheeple will continue to move about, clueless as usual. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIEF DOC 99 Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Roight! Lead, Follow or get the Flock out of the way! Back to Work... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blu Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Who cares, if they want to listen to me talking dirty to my girlfriend they can have at it. If they happen to overhear the plans of a major terror plot along the way, that would be great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalper38 Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 I'm active military so my DNA is in who knows how many databases; I have a TS clearance so my secrets are noted somewhere; and I swipe a card everywhere I go at work so they know where I am and what I'm doing. I don't have anything to hide from this government since I work for it and will do all I can to protect this country. BUT........the principle of this is bullshit. I don't want them involving themselves in my private conversations or other goings on. The libertarian in me is pissed about this one. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maninbox Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 I'm active military so my DNA is in who knows how many databases; I have a TS clearance so my secrets are noted somewhere; and I swipe a card everywhere I go at work so they know where I am and what I'm doing. I don't have anything to hide from this government since I work for it and will do all I can to protect this country. BUT........the principle of this is bullshit. I don't want them involving themselves in my private conversations or other goings on. The libertarian in me is pissed about this one. Well, if that's the way you feel, the IRS will be watching you.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalper38 Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 Well, if that's the way you feel, the IRS will be watching you.... Yeah, I'm sure they already are. What pisses me off about them is the money they've wasted, ~$150M in the past 2-3 years on so-called training conferences, could've built our National Guard Soldiers anywhere from 3-10 new facilities that could get them out of the 50+ year old facilities they've been trying to serve in. On top of that, right now (all because of the GSA conference boondoggle) it takes a 3-star general to approve ANYONE's travel here where I work. We have to PROVE it's "mission essential". That dumbass testifying yesterday (Mr. Fink, I swear really his name) should have just said, "yes, I realized it was a big mistake the minute it hit the news." At least he could have showed us in the end he had a little integrity. Instead, he wouldn't come out and say WHEN he felt embarrassed, only that he was embarrassed. Then he STILL wouldn't admit that HE WAS THE ONE who approved the $4.3M until someone that worked under him pointed out that it was his name on the approval document. F'n unbelievable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vintageroger Posted June 7, 2013 Author Share Posted June 7, 2013 (edited) Then he STILL wouldn't admit that HE WAS THE ONE who approved the $4.3M until someone that worked under him pointed out that it was his name on the approval document. F'n unbelievable. Sounds like Eric Holder. These people lie and then lie about the lie. Nothing ever happens to them, in fact most times they get promoted. sick just sick. Edited June 7, 2013 by Vintageroger 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whadayawant Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 Don't worry, last time th' gov'ment listened ta my calls it only cost me a few years in th' federal pen. It's yer turn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONMYI Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 Aaannd now, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice is appointed as National Security adviser.. WTF Guess it's all just part of the big plan ! Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blu Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 You are all talking politics in a non-approved thread! This is a clear violation of forum rules that are strictly enforced by our beloved moderators. Please report to the drunk tank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vintageroger Posted June 7, 2013 Author Share Posted June 7, 2013 Correct me if I'm wrong but this was in the news and is a current event. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maldev Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 And there's nothing in the TOS against political discussions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunters Friend Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 And there's nothing in the TOS against political discussions. Umm....may want to go back and read those again. That was what started the whole moderator thing in the first place - no politics allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maldev Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 Umm....may want to go back and read those again. That was what started the whole moderator thing in the first place - no politics allowed. Read for content: CONDUCT GUIDELINES & ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY 1) To post or transmit hate speech, harassing content, threats of violence against another member written in a serious manner or joking with even a hint of seriousness shall lead to a 48 hour suspension or immediate suspension from the forum at the Administrators discretion. 2) It's fine to disagree, but once a thread has run its course, and degenerated into little more than an orgy of insults, it will be locked. While this will require a judgment call by the Administrators & Moderators. The members of this site can keep our moderating to a minimum by exercising a little discretion and self- control. Keep profanity down to the minimum or else we will put a 48-hour ban off the forums. 3) Pure flaming, either to upset someone or simply for your personal enjoyment, is strictly prohibited. If you're here to cause trouble, it will result in an immediate BAN! 4) To post on the forum links to other websites; whether in regards to selling merchandise, or promoting other riders groups that may or may not represent any current and/or future marketable interests of the forum by way of capitalizing on our platform thru our members in which you have commercial interest in or are a member of without the prior written permission or approval of the forum is not authorized, and strictly prohibited. This does not prohibit posting a link to a website which allows other members to contact suppliers of products or services which you have purchased or used of which you have no vested interest in, either as a owner, shareholder, or member. 5) Posting or transmitting commercial or bulk e-mail through use of this bulletin board network will lead to a suspension of membership. 6) No Spamming or Advertising on the forum in regards to any product(s) unless you are a paid advertiser, or have had the prior administrator's approval is allowed! 7) No inappropriate pictures, i.e. vulger nudity will not be permitted. To post or transmit content that is obscene or that violates child pornography statutes; including but not limited to graphic depictions of sexual acts, or visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct involving children; or that contains depictions of children engaged is such actions will be turned over to the appropriate law enforcement agency of jurisdiction. 8) Fraudulent practices or attempts to defraud another will lead to account suspension and banning. This is in direct reference to items offered for sale, trade, or leading someone on as a buyer. This also applies to people posting untruths about another user or business. If you have a real issue, discuss it off the site. 9) To engage in illegal, unlawful, or tortuous conduct or other conduct that interferes with the forums ability to provide service or interferes with the rights of others. Such conduct includes, but is not limited to: libel, invasion of privacy, consumer fraud, unauthorized dissemination of trade secrets, violation of trademark laws, hacking, or transmittal of commercially restricted information is forbidden. 10) All For Sale posts shall have a price or prices, as well as your location. No bids or auctions are allowed. If a Moderator or Administrator here asks you to post price(s) and you have not within a 12-hour time frame, your thread will be deleted. 11) To post or transmit material in violation of copyright laws. Or to pass on any information with out credit to the writer or owner is forbidden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIEF DOC 99 Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 Fight CISPA here The House Reps have passed CISPA legislation to control and regulate internet content, now it's on to the Senate. Big Brother Cyclops is on a body building program these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blu Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 (edited) Allow me to clarify my prior post. Edited June 7, 2013 by Blu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIEF DOC 99 Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 There's a fine line between articulating political persuasions and the ol' orgie of insults. We can't help but entertain and aquire differing political views from our life experience. Everybody has their own opinions and has a right to express those views. We've all been around long enough to know what's busted and how we can fix the future. Seems it's the 'what's busted and what to do about it' part that folks get most uptight about. Anyhow the guidlines here say: 2) It's fine to disagree, but once a thread has run its course, and degenerated into little more than an orgy of insults, it will be locked. While this will require a judgment call by the Administrators & Moderators. The members of this site can keep our moderating to a minimum by exercising a little discretion and self- control. Discretion and self-control...key words I reckon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalper38 Posted June 7, 2013 Share Posted June 7, 2013 Sounds like Eric Holder. These people lie and then lie about the lie. Nothing ever happens to them, in fact most times they get promoted. sick just sick. Fink WAS promoted!! When he performed as Mr. Spock and approved the $4.3M boondoggle he was #2. Since then he has been promoted to #1 in that division. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firebird77clone Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 "tortuous conduct" You mean more tortuous than reading the conduct guidelines? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.