Jump to content
Indian Motorcycle Community

A Little Bit Of Payback

Recommended Posts

From today’s wall street journal




A Doctor's Plan for Legal Industry Reform

My modest proposal to rearrange how lawyers do business.




Since we are moving toward socialism with ObamaCare, the time has come to do the

same with other professions—especially lawyers. Physician committees can decide

whether lawyers are necessary in any given situation.


At a town-hall meeting in Portsmouth, N.H., last month, our uninformed lawyer in

chief suggested that we physicians would rather chop off a foot than manage

diabetes since we would make more money doing surgery. Then President Obama

compounded his attack by claiming a doctor's reimbursement is between "$30,000"

and "$50,000" for such amputations! (Actually, such surgery costs only about



Physicians have never been so insulted. Because of these affronts, I will gladly

volunteer for the important duty of controlling and regulating lawyers. Since

most of what lawyers do is repetitive boilerplate or pushing paper, physicians

would have no problem dictating what is appropriate for attorneys. We physicians

know much more about legal practice than lawyers do about medicine.


Following are highlights of a proposed bill authorizing the dismantling of the

current framework of law practice and instituting socialized legal care:


• Contingency fees will be discou raged, and eventually outlawed, over a

five-year period. This will put legal rewards back into the pockets of the

deserving—the public and the aggrieved parties. Slick lawyers taking their "cut"

smacks of a bookie operation. Attorneys will be permitted to keep up to 3% in

contingency cases, the remainder going into a pool for poor people.


• Legal "DRGs." Each potential legal situation will be assigned a relative

value, and charges limited to this amount. Program participation and acceptance

of this amount is mandatory, regardless of the number of hours spent on the

matter. Government schedules of flat fees for each service, analogous to

medicine's Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), will be issued. For example, any

divorce will have a set fee of, say, $1,000, regardless of its simplicity or

complexity. This will eliminate shady hourly billing. Niggling fees such as $2

per page photocopied or faxed would disappear. Who else nickels-and-dimes you

while at the same time charging hundreds of dollars per hour? I'm surprised

lawyers don't tack shipping and handling onto their bills.


• Legal "death panels." Over 75? You will not be entitled to legal care for any

matter. Why waste money on those who are only going to die soon? We can decrease

utilization, save money and unclog the courts simultaneously. Grandma, you're on

your own.


• Ration legal care. One may need to wait months to consult an attorney. Despite

a perceived legal need, physician review panels or government bureaucrats may

deem advice unnecessary. Possibly one may not get representation before court

dates or deadlines. But that' s tough: What do you want for "free"?


• Physician controlled legal review. This is potentially the most exciting

reform, with doctors leading committees for determining the necessity of all

legal procedures and the fairness of attorney fees. What a wonderful way for

doctors to get even with the sharks attempting to eviscerate the practice of



• Discourage/eliminate specialization. Legal specialists with extra training and

experience charge more money, contributing to increased costs of legal care,

making it unaffordable for many. This reform will guarantee a selection of

mediocre, unmotivated attorneys but should help slow rising legal costs. Big

shot under indictment? Classified National Archives documents down your pants?

Sitting president defending against impeachment? Have FBI agents found $90,000

in your freezer? Too bad. Under reform you too may have to go to the government

legal shop for advice.


• Electronic legal records. We should enter the digital age and computerize and

centralize legal records nationwide. All files must be in a standard, preferably

inconvenient, format and must be available to government agencies. A single

database of judgments, court records, client files, etc. will decrease20legal

expenses. Anyone with Internet access will be able to search the database,

eliminating unjustifiable fees charged by law firms for supposedly proprietary

information, while fostering transparency. It will enable consumers to dump

their clunker attorneys and transfer records easily.


• Ban legal advertisements. Catchy phone numbers such as 1-800-LAWYERS would be

seized by the government and repurposed for reporting unscrupulous attorneys.


• New government oversight. Government overhead to manage the legal system will

include a cabinet secretary, commissioners, ombudsmen, auditors, assistants,

czars and departments.


• Collect data about the supply of and demand for attorneys.Create a commission

to study the diversity and geographic distribution of attorneys, with power to

stipulate and enforce corrective actions to right imbalances. The more

bureaucracy the better. One can never have too many eyes watching these sleazy



• Lawyer Reduction Act (H.R. -3200). A self-explanatory bill that not only

decreases the number of law students, but also arbitrarily removes 3,200

attorneys from practice each year. Textbook addition by subtraction.


Enthusiastically embracing the above legal changes can serve as a "teachable

moment" and will go a long way toward giving the lawyers who run Congress a

taste of their own medicine.


Dr. Rafal is a radiologist in New York City.


Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of

this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For

non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints

at 1-800-843-0008 or visit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Juris Doctorate?


Eliminate the fuss and chain 'em all to the bottom of the ocean. :):D:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...